Several hypotheses can be deemed to clarify the incident involving an Air Canada plane previous Friday at the San Francisco airport in California and which could have turned into a catastrophe.


According to an aviation specialist consulted by TVA Nouvelles, several elements need to have to be analyzed in purchase to comprehend why AC759 from Toronto aligned with a targeted traffic lane exactly where 4 other plane had been on tactic Somewhat than on the airstrip that was cleared for him.


“The most risky features in a flight are landing and takeoff. Was there drizzle? Fog? Have been not the monitor coordinates correctly entered? There are several elements that occur into participate in. As we say in the globe of aviation, an incident like this does not occur as a downpour, “stated the previous pilot and aviation expert Pierre Rochefort who also evokes the” fatigue factor. “








The specialist also factors out that as the incident transpired in the dark, the lights that mark the tracks really should have been a clue that the Airbus A320 was not pointing in the right spot.


“The lights are distinctive. The working day we do not seriously see them, but at evening the lights are blue for the taxiway and purple for the monitor, “states Pierre Rochefort according to whom this form of occasion is” particularly uncommon. “


“Generally, on large conveyors, almost everything is automatic up to a few hundred toes higher than the ground. At that level, 1 of the pilots took manage to land the plane, “the previous pilot concluded.


According to the audio recording of the conversations, it was in the end a ground pilot who warned the manage tower that flight 759 was heading in the erroneous spot and then the controller quickly instructed the pilot to “change the throttle” .


The pilot subsequently made a loop over the Pacific Ocean ahead of re-approaching, then landed unhindered at :17 neighborhood time, 54 minutes late.





Leave a Reply